The proposed amendment, as introduced in the National Assembly of Pakistan, seeks to amend section 489F of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860, and the corresponding provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.
- Changes to Section 489F, PPC: The amendment focuses on strengthening the deterrent measures against the issuance of dishonoured cheques. It categorises the punishment based on the amount mentioned in the cheque:
- If less than Rs. 1 million: Imprisonment up to 3 years or a fine not less than double the amount mentioned in the cheque, or both.
- Between Rs. 1 million and Rs. 5 million: Imprisonment up to 5 years or a fine not less than double the amount, or both.
- Between Rs. 5 million and Rs. 10 million: Imprisonment up to 7 years or a fine not less than double the amount, or both.
- Above Rs. 10 million: Imprisonment up to 10 years or a fine not less than double the amount, or both. There is also an opportunity for the issuer to prove that they made adequate arrangements with their bank, but the bank failed in honouring the cheque, providing a defence.
- Amendment in Schedule II of CrPC: The amendment also changes the classification of the offences related to dishonoured cheques under Schedule II of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It alters the forum of trial:
- For amounts less than Rs. 1 million: Trial by Magistrate of the First Class.
- For amounts exceeding Rs. 1 million: Trial by the Court of Session.
Impact of the Amendment: The objective of the amendment is to increase the severity of punishments based on the cheque amount to reflect the gravity of the financial damage caused by dishonoured cheques. The amendment recognises the rising amounts involved in cheque dishonouring cases, especially in commercial contexts where substantial financial obligations are involved. By setting graduated punishments, the amendment aims to:
- Ensure proportionality between the financial amount involved and the punishment.
- Discourage the misuse of cheques in financial transactions by imposing stricter penalties.
- Provide a defence mechanism where the dishonour was due to the bank’s fault, balancing fairness with the punishment.
- Shift higher-value cases to the Court of Session, reflecting the seriousness of the financial stakes involved.
This move is intended to tighten financial discipline, reduce reliance on civil remedies for such matters (which are often prolonged), and restore public trust in the legal system’s ability to deliver swift and fair justice at least in the subordinate judiciary.
The proposed amendment to Section 489F of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) as seen in the recent bill introduced by Mr. Sohail Sultan seeks to address concerns regarding dishonoured cheques. The amendment aims to introduce a tiered system of punishments based on the value of the cheque, with the penalties increasing in proportion to the amount involved. This restructuring is an attempt to ensure that individuals who issue dishonoured cheques, especially in cases involving large sums, face appropriate and more severe consequences.
Historically, Section 489F was introduced to deal with dishonestly issuing cheques that are subsequently dishonoured, but over time, concerns have arisen about its effectiveness, particularly in commercial disputes involving large financial obligations. The proposed amendment addresses this by:
- Introducing stricter penalties for higher amounts of dishonoured cheques.
- Differentiating between smaller and larger financial disputes, ensuring that cases involving substantial amounts receive greater judicial attention.
- Allowing defendants to establish a defence if they can prove that the dishonour occurred due to the bank’s fault despite adequate arrangements being made.
This amendment has garnered attention as it aligns the legal framework with the modern financial environment, where cheques involving millions of rupees are commonly used in commercial transactions. The focus is on providing a more robust deterrent and reinforcing financial discipline in business dealings.
The overall impact of this amendment would be to strengthen the enforcement of financial obligations and ensure that dishonest actions in financial transactions do not go unchecked. By allowing courts to impose higher fines and longer prison sentences, the amendment is likely to restore public confidence in the judicial system’s ability to handle cheque dishonour cases more effectively.
The amendment to Section 489F of the Pakistan Penal Code, while aiming to strengthen financial discipline and deter the issuance of dishonoured cheques, could present several challenges in its practical implementation.
- Overburdening of Courts: The tiered system of punishments could lead to a significant increase in litigation, particularly with individuals and businesses seeking to use the criminal justice system to recover debts rather than resolving issues through civil litigation. The introduction of higher penalties may encourage creditors to file criminal complaints, thereby further burdening an already overstretched judiciary. While the amendment does seek to differentiate cases based on cheque amounts, this could still lead to delays in resolving disputes, especially in lower courts.
- Abuse of Criminal Proceedings: There is a risk that the amendment might be misused as a tool for coercion in commercial disputes. Parties could leverage the threat of criminal punishment to pressure debtors into settling cases, even when the dishonour may have occurred due to genuine financial hardship or banking errors. This could disproportionately affect smaller businesses and individuals who may not have the resources to mount a robust legal defence.
- Potential for Unintended Consequences: By focusing on stricter penalties, the amendment may inadvertently criminalise business disputes that would be better addressed through civil proceedings. It could create an environment where businesses are reluctant to engage in transactions involving post-dated cheques, fearing the severe criminal consequences of cheque dishonour. This could reduce trust in the cheque system itself and lead to a preference for other payment methods, thereby altering traditional business practices.
- Bank Error Defence: While the amendment allows for a defence if the dishonour was due to a bank’s fault, proving such a defence may be difficult in practice. Banks may be reluctant to accept responsibility, leaving the cheque issuer in a vulnerable position. Furthermore, the evidentiary burden on the defendant to establish this defence could be substantial, requiring legal expertise and financial resources that many individuals or small businesses may lack.
- Impact on Small Businesses: The amendment could have a particularly harsh impact on small businesses that rely on cheques for day-to-day transactions. The fear of imprisonment and heavy fines might deter business owners from issuing cheques altogether, disrupting commercial practices and creating liquidity issues in an economy that still heavily relies on cheque transactions.
In conclusion, while the amendment aims to enhance financial accountability and deter fraudulent cheque issuance, it could also introduce significant challenges, particularly in terms of judicial workload, potential abuse of the law in business disputes, and its disproportionate impact on smaller enterprises.
Call for Free Legal Advice +92-3048734889
Email : [email protected]
https://joshandmakinternational.com
