Petitioner’s writ petition was dismissed by High Court on the ground that alternate remedy of representation to President being available to him, he could not avail same–Legality–Petitioner could not furnish any plausible justification on his failure to avail alternate remedy–Futile attempt, however, has been made to cover inefficiency, carelessness and callous approach of officers concerned who failed to invoke provisions contained in Art. 32 of the Order of 1983, under the garb of writ petitions which have rightly been dismissed–Orders’ impugned being well reasoned, and un-exceptionable would need no interference