14. Misappropriation dishonesty and fraud- No oral or documentary evidence-Neither despatch report nor despatch receipt bears appellant’s signatures–Prosecution had not led oral or documentary evidence to show that conduct of appellant reflected any element to bring case within mischief–Not an iota of evidence even from any members of staff led to show that appellant was incharge of centre in question when wheat stock was despatched–In implementation of order passed by D.D.F., in terms of which a penalty was imposed, recovery amount deposited but receipt bears no signature of. appellant–Held further : Prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt–Appeal allowed