8. Proof of Sources:- Appellant (civil servant) had not denied existence of agricultural land in the name of his mother, two plots in the name of his wife and had not denied partnership of Flour Mills in the name of his wife, having been acquired during his service tenure-Appellant could not prove his assertion that assets in question were purchased by his mother and wife through their own sources of income-Sufficient evidence was produced to concluded that appellant was guilty of offence under S. 9 of Ordinance of 1999, punishable under S. 10 of Ordinance-Trial Court was right in its conclusion to record conviction and sentence-Conviction and sentence recorded against appellant was maintained.