Material contradictions in prosecution evidence–PWs stated that 2 slabs of charas were sent for chemical report while chemical examiner revealed that he had received 3 slab–PWs could not identify in Court which slabs were sent to examiner–Similarly statements of PWs that other 31 slabs were packed alongwith a chit signed by them in a fibre bag were again falsified when the bag was opened and found 32 slabs but not any chit in it–In such a situation appellants must be given benefit of doubt–High Court accepted appeal and set aside conviction order of trial Court