Prosecution witnesses were contradictory and discrepant one–Delay in sending property to Chemical Examiner would cast doubt on factum of recovery–Weight of recovered narcotic was not proved–Reasonable doubt was thus, available to accused/appellant was acquitted on basis benefit of doubt.
Copyright © 2019 Josh and Mak International .
© Copyright 2008-2016 Josh and Mak International - All rights reserved.
This site is protected by wp-copyrightpro.com
Translate »Copy Protected by Chetan's WP-Copyprotect.